Assignment Task: Plaint Under Order VII Rule 1 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure 1908
The plaintiff above named begs to state as under:
The address of the plaintiff for the purpose of service of summons, notices, etc., from this Hon’ble Court is as stated in the cause title and also of his counsel, Advocate, No. , 3rd Floor, Complex, 3rd Main, Gandhinagar, Bangalore – 560 009.
The address of the defendants for similar purposes of service of notice, summons, etc., from this Hon’ble Court is as stated in the cause.
That the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the property bearing 2234, now assigned with the municipal No.50/3, 2nd Cross, A Block, Subramanya Nagar, Bangalore – 560 003, measuring east to west on the southern side 42 feet, on the western side 46 feet, and north to south 15 feet in all measuring 660 sq.ft. with residential building which is more fully and particularly described in the schedule hereunder and hereinafter referred to as the Schedule ‘A’ Property for the sake of brevity. That the husband of the Plaintiff late Gundappa has acquired the schedule property under a Sale Deed dated 05.09.1977 from his vendor Sri.Rangappa for valuable Sale Consideration, which is registered as document No.1892/1977-78, in Book-I, Volume No.290, at page 33 to 35, in the office of the Sub-Registrar Rajajinagar, Bangalore. The copy of the Sale Deed is herewith enclosed as Document No.1.
The Plaintiff submits that her husband Sri.Gundappa died on 07.2012, leaving behind the Plaintiff, Son, and Daughter. The Death Certificate is herewith enclosed as Document No.2. Thereafter the Plaintiff made an application before the Assistant Revenue Officer, Subramanya Nagar Ward, BBMP, Bangalore, for the transfer of Khatha and other revenue records in her name in respect of the schedule property. The concerned authority has transferred Khatha of the schedule property in the name of Plaintiff and assessed the property to revenue and has paid taxes to the concerned authority. The Plaintiff is herewith furnishing the Khatha Certificate, Khatha Extract, and Tax paid receipts as Document No.3 to 5. The Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike has also issued a confirmation letter indicating that the earlier site No.2234 being assigned with Municipal No.50/3 under the letter dated 18.08.2008. The Copy of the said letter is herewith enclosed as Document No.6. The Plaintiff is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property and exercising all the rights of true ownership over the schedule property.
That the Defendant No.1 is the owner of the property bearing old No.2235 and 2236 and new No 51 and No.52, PID No 065- W0060-19 and PID No 065-W0060-15, 2nd cross, ‘A’ block, Subramanya Nagar, Bangalore – 560 003, which is adjoining the Plaintiff’s The said Property is more fully and particularly described in the schedule hereunder and hereinafter referred to as the Schedule ‘B’ Property for the sake of brevity. The Plaintiff is herewith enclosing the sketch furnished by the first defendant while seeking sanction of plan before the Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike authorities and the same is here within enclosed as Document No. 7. The said sketch clearly indicates the boundaries of both the schedule properties.
That the Defendant has obtained the sanction plan and license from the BBMP to put up new construction vide LP Ad.Com/WST/0282/14-15 dated 28.11.2014. As per the sanctioned plan, the Defendant No.1 is entitled to put up only basement, ground, and three upper floors only on the said property. The Plaintiff is herewith enclosing the sanctioned plan and license as Document No.8 & 9. The plan also indicates the setbacks to be left by the defendants while putting up the construction, but the defendants have not even left one foot also and thus contravened the terms of the license and the undertaking given before the sanctioning authorities, which can be visualized by looking at the photographs.
That the Defendant No.1 has engaged the Defendant No.2 to put up the construction and also Defendant No.2 is the General Power of Attorney Holder of the Defendant No.1. The Defendants are putting up the construction in utter violation of the sanctioned plan and license and have not left the requisite setbacks and further have illegally and unauthorizedly put up two additional upper floors in addition to what is sanctioned by the BBMP That the said construction carried on by the Defendants is illegal and contrary to law. The Plaintiff being the adjoining owner is put to a lot of inconvenience and there is obstruction for free flow of light and air and the said construction is causing a nuisance and there is no peacefulness to the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff has requested the Defendants to put up the constructions in accordance with law, but the Defendants have ignored the request and are putting up the construction according to their whims and fancies. The Plaintiff is herewith furnishing the photographs and CD as Document No.10 & 11.
Since the Defendants did not heed the advice of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff has lodged a complaint with the BBMP authorities and the BBMP authorities have inspected the property and have noticed the illegal construction and have issued a notice under Section 321 (1) of KMC Act and passed a preliminary order and called upon the Defendant No.1 to stop the construction and to demolish the illegally constructed portion by passing an order under Section 321 (2) confirming the interim order and further passed the final