Complete Foster a Culture of Innovation Discussion Post
Discussion: Creative Teams and Creative ConflictsHave you ever worked on a team that struggled to complete a project? 

Complete Foster a Culture of Innovation Discussion Post
Discussion: Creative Teams and Creative ConflictsHave you ever worked on a team that struggled to complete a project?

In your first MBA course, Dynamic Leadership,you learned about the “big five” personality traits that can potentially lead to conflicts in the workplace; but differences in creative thinking styles can also keep a team from functioning effectively. The major thinking styles you will learn about this week can provide insight into the reasons why conflicts can arise among individuals and teams trying to innovate.For example, perhaps you have worked on a team with someone who you thought asked too many questions or focused on what appeared to you to be insignificant details. As a leader, you need to learn how to accommodate a diversity of creative thinking styles in effective ways.For this Discussion, you will consider your own creative thinking styles and how they differ from others in your current (or a past) workplace environment. Consider how different creative thinking styles can potentially create conflict among teams. You can review the five personality traits that were covered in a previous course by referring to the Digman article in the Optional Resources this week.With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 3Post a cohesive analysis using the scenario presented in this week’s media piece, Creative Teams and Creative Conflicts, in which a team is unable to make progress on a project. In your post, incorporate the following:An analysis of the barriers that prevented the group from leveraging their differences and creating innovative ideas.Three suggested ways that their process could be improved, despite their different styles.An explanation of how you would approach the scenario differently and lead the group towards success if you were asked to lead the team.A description of how you would implement the three ways you identified above to help the group improve.Finally, include an explanation of how you could use the strategies described in this week’s chapter from Creative leadership: Skills that drive change to accommodate the diversity of thinking styles to lead the group in a unified direction.

Campbellsville University AstraZeneca PLC Primary Business Activities Paper
Research and then describe your company’s primary business activities.

 Include:A brief historical summary,A list of compet …

Campbellsville University AstraZeneca PLC Primary Business Activities Paper
Research and then describe your company’s primary business activities. Include:A brief historical summary,A list of competitors,The company’s position within the industry,Recent developments within the company/industry,Future direction, andOther items of significance to your corporation.Include information from a variety of resources. For example:Consult the Form 10-K filed with the SEC.Review the Annual Report and especially the Letter to ShareholdersExplore the corporate website.Select at least two significant news items from recent business periodical.

4 pages

Week 6
Data set 2 presents a sample of the number of defective flash drives produced by a small manufacturing company over the la …

Week 6
Data set 2 presents a sample of the number of defective flash drives produced by a small manufacturing company over the last 30 weeks. The company’s …

5 pages

Pepsico
PepsiCo is a company that deals with beverages and foodstuffs designed to bring a smile to consumers’ faces, anytime anywh …

Pepsico
PepsiCo is a company that deals with beverages and foodstuffs designed to bring a smile to consumers’ faces, anytime anywhere, and its main aim is to …

MBA 5001 South University Production and Operations MGT Coca Cola Summary and Analysis
Assume that the human resources department of your selected organization has received disappointing results on a job motiv …

MBA 5001 South University Production and Operations MGT Coca Cola Summary and Analysis
Assume that the human resources department of your selected organization has received disappointing results on a job motivation survey administered to all employees at all levels. The results indicate that employees reported lower-than-industry-average job motivation, and management is concerned. 

Employee comments on the survey included the following:

My job is so boring!My boss micromanages me but never tells me how I’m doing.I’ve been in my position for fifteen years, but I am never allowed to provide any input about making the work better.You have been tasked with writing a paper that reviews the theoretical perspectives relevant to the situation in your organization. In particular, you are interested in systems theory and job motivation for this week’s analysis.Tasks:Write a paper addressing the following:

Summary: 

Identify the organization you select and provide a summary of it. What is it? What does it do? Cite research from a variety of sources, including the company’s website, social media sites, company blogs, industry and trade sources, and other sources. The summary should include the organization’s products or services, customer or client base, areas of operation or distribution, history, main competition, and current situation (whether it is an industry leader, a start-up, or a well-established corporation).

Analysis: Analyze the factors that affect job motivation and the internal and external consequences of low job motivation. At this time, you do not need to propose any solutions. Rather, you are using scholarly literature and data (e.g., observations, discussions, events, outcomes, reports, etc.) from your organization to analyze factors and consequences related to job motivation. The company is Coca Cola write an email as a reply to a supervisor and coworker confronting you on a mistake you made.

Instructions You have just received two emails, one from your boss or supervisor and one from a coworker. The two emails …

write an email as a reply to a supervisor and coworker confronting you on a mistake you made.
Instructions You have just received two emails, one from your boss or supervisor and one from a coworker. The two emails address the same situation. A minor problem has occurred that you may be responsible for creating. Your boss/supervisor has asked you for a resolution to the problem. Your coworker, who has been affected by this problem, is angry with you and has written an inflammatory email accusing you of creating this problem on purpose. Using word, write an email as a reply to both of the emails that you have received. You should attempt to resolve the problem as efficiently as possible. Since your email will be received both by a supervisor and a coworker, consider all aspects of your communication including the formality of the language you use, grammar, and all aspects of formal communication. Your goal is to solve the problem and maintain your professionalism at the same time.

On the same document, analyze the conflict that has happened. 

What was the cause of the conflict?

 How did you attempt to resolve the conflict? 

What did you need to address in terms of your supervisor’s concerns, and how were these different from your coworker’s concerns? 

Do you think your supervisor and coworker handled the conflict well in their emails to you? 

How effective are these emails? 

Criteria Email effectively reaches a solution for all aspects of the problem and addresses all concerns in both emails. Solution reached is complete, effective, and does not create any additional potential problems.Email is professional throughout. Tone, language, spelling, syntax and other aspects of communication are accurate and effective.Analysis offers a clear definition of the conflict and explanation of the solution offered with significant detail. Comparison of received emails is accurate and thorough and indicates a high level of knowledge regarding these differences.Analysis of the effectiveness of the two received emails is clear and complete and demonstrates a deep knowledge of concepts regarding the effectiveness of written communication.